A Guest Post by Emily Simmons

One of the fun things about posting with a title like this one is that I knew I was coming back to it sooner or later.  Well, The Law and the Lady is finished, and we’ve had another meeting to discuss its attractions (many) and repulsions (some, yes).  Of the serialized reading experience I have little else to say. At the end of my forced hiatus I finished the novel in one gulp; it certainly wasn’t lacking in page-turning sensation.  But I have been keeping ideas of reading like the Victorians in the back of my mind, and am well aware that apart from differing temporal rhythms and material realities of paper, surrounding periodical matter, and illustrations, I am distanced not a little by my 21st-century reaction to Valeria’s self-abnegating decisions in the later part of the book.  She, acclaimed on the back of the OUP edition as the first “woman detective” to be the heroine of a “full-length novel,” is pleasingly resolute and stubborn throughout the first two-thirds of this novel, at least to my eye.  Then, of course, she does a one-eighty for the honour of her husband, the sake of her child, &co. &co. While I completely understand the ideological and cultural necessity of this move for the novel, for Valeria as a character, and for Collins, my emotional (non-academic) reaction remains, and prevents me from understanding it as we might project a female reader in 1875 would have.

That said, I think that many ways to engage with serial texts in manners alternative to the modern paperback remain.  I would, for one, be extremely interested in the kind of course Daniel proposes, which intersperse serial novels with other periodical reading matter.  (With Bleak House and Household Words, as well, I’d be strongly tempted to include Cranford, or at least its second half.)  Or, to return to Tara’s comments about illustration, I spent some time yesterday browsing through the original installments of The Law and the Lady in The Graphic. Each number was prefaced by a large illustration, several of which displayed Misserimus Dexter in his most spectacular poses (i.e. the few moments in the novel where he exits his wheelchair.) Clearly there is something going on here that has to do with supplying an audience’s (real or supposed) desire for the grotesque other in visual as well as textual forms.  These representations, if not constitutive of plot, are at least concretizing an interpretation of Dexter’s representation that the text itself leaves more open.

And finally, to add another strand to this webby post, in our reading group discussions we repeatedly touched upon  narrative gaps that seemed to be a product of serial composition, as Jen discusses here.  In one chapter Valeria narrates a scene of conversation with her mother-in-law, and at the beginning of the next chapter she reveals that the conversation “(of which I have only presented a brief abstract) lasted until quite late in the afternoon” (201). Intrigued by the possibility that Valeria’s retroactive adjustments to her story might indicate Collins’s own haste, I returned to The Graphic only to find that, in this instance, the representation and its subsequent refinement occur in the same installment. Foiled! Ah well, at least I have composed this post on the spur of the moment, and am now thinking that a more appropriate title would have something to do with gathering, or pinging … Alas, I am beholden to my previous publication, so “Serialized Reading, Part II” it is.

Emily Simmons is a doctoral candidate studying Victorian Literature at the University of Toronto.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Serialized Reading, in Two Parts. Part II.

  1. Great post Emily! I had a similar reaction to the gender politics of The Law and The Lady as well as to its representation of disability. Your use of the word grotesque is apt for the strange characterization of Misserimus Dexter. I must admit to feeling confused about — and rather disappointed in — the novel’s construction of disability since elsewhere Collins is rather progressive on disability-related issues (in, for example, Hide and Seek or Poor Miss Finch). This confusion, I’m sure, stems from that temporal gap that you note which prevents me from understanding how Collins could be so forward-thinking about disability in some texts and so retrogressive in others.

  2. Thanks Jen, I haven’t read Hide and Seek or Poor Miss Finch yet, so it’s encouraging to know that they contain representations of disability that are more 21st-century-reader-friendly. Now I am equally curious about Collins’s ability to offer such a wide range of representations from text to text …

  3. I haven’t read _The Law and the Lady_, but I’m looking for a fun Victorian novel and it sounds like this one fits the bill. I just love Cranford–I wonder if a course with a focus on serial reading could include serial television. I balked at the idea of Judy Dench playing Miss Matty–she’s hardly known for playing querulous old women, but I feel like she actually made herself physically smaller for the part.

  4. Karen, thank you, and yes I loved Judy Dench in that role as well. It almost makes me glad, and not for the first time, that Gaskell ‘accidentally’ killed Miss Jenkyns after the first installment not knowing that she would write more. If the elder Jenkyns sister had continued through the rest of the plot, well, not only would it have been a radically different story, but perhaps Judy Dench would have been the more likely choice for that role.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s