I have noticed an interesting affective moment that recurs again and again in George Eliot’s fiction. The typical scene involves the struggle of a man to resist his attraction to, and involvement with, a woman he knows he should keep his distance from. Then, despite his good intentions, he witnesses her tears and instantly loses his head in a passionate capitulation to his desire.

For instance, in Adam Bede, Arthur Donnithorne tries to resist Hetty Sorrel’s charms but one look at the pretty buttermaker’s tears destroy all his efforts and rationalization to resist her. When Hetty meets Arthur at the Hermitage, she begins to cry and her tears and her “long dewy lashes” seem to tempt him into speaking tenderly to her and setting into motion the relationship that leads to tragedy (131).

In Middlemarch, the moment when Lydgate and Rosamond Vincy become engaged, despite his intentions to remain unfettered in service of his research, is occasioned by her tears and “helpless quivering” (259).  Eliot writes that “Lydgate, forgetting everything else, completely mastered by the outrush of tenderness at the sudden belief that this sweet  young creature depended on him for her joy, actually put his arms round her, folding her gently and protectingly … and kissed each of the two large tears” (259).

The tears of Maggie Tulliver in The Mill on the Floss, Gwendolyn Harleth in Daniel Deronda, and Esther Lyon in Felix Holt each have similar effects on the men who are drawn to them against their own will. In many of these cases, the tears of the woman are often described as somehow overcoming the intentions of the man and causing him waver in his resolve.

These moments leave me wondering about the libidinal currency of tears in Eliot’s fiction. Furthermore, how do these emotional interactions fit into Eliot’s understanding of the value of empathy? After all, Arthur’s involvement with Hetty and Lydgate’s marriage to Rosamond lead to very negative results. Are these moments of potential empathetic connection somehow corrupted by the way they are bound up with desire, gender, and ego?

Eliot, George. Adam Bede. Penguin, 1980.

Eliot, George. Middlemarch. Broadview, 2004.

Advertisements

One thought on “He “kissed each of the two large tears”: Affect and Desire in Eliot’s fiction

  1. This is a really great observation, Jen. I think my first reply to your final question is, yes. These moments seem to be more about ego and less about empathy for me. In the two instances you cite above, from Adam Bede and Middlemarch, I read the woman’s tears are a sign of her dependent femininity — which Eliot marks as problematic. And these moments seem to allow the men to indulge in a fantasy of power and control, a fantasy that is soon after unraveled. Still not sure where that leaves the libidinal currency of tears, but thanks for a thought-provoking post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s