I’ve just come back from this year’s NVSA at Columbia.  If you haven’t been, this is a conference I particularly like to attend just for the sake of attending.  There are no concurrent panels, so it really feels like a communal intellectual enterprise as the shared experience of seeing many papers as an audience builds up over the weekend.

This year’s theme was “Clichés and Orthodoxies.”  Two papers I particularly liked were Aeron Hunt’s (U of New Mexico), “Methodological Orthodoxies and the Business of Victorian Character” and Sarah Maurer’s (University of Notre Dame), “Caring for Strangers: The Sketch Writer and the Parish Visitor”.  These papers looked at the development of narrative structures that we often see as novelistic–such as the representation of character, and the possibilities of sympathy–in character books kept by businessmen and parish visiting manuals respectively.  I had no idea that businessmen kept little black books on people’s characters–this pre-Facebook surveillance on potential employees and clients was fascinating material.

As is inevitably the case, not every Victorian cliché could possibly be covered in the course of a weekend.  I would have loved to hear more about the clichés of Victorian criticism (Houghton or perhaps Gubar and Gilbert), or maybe Victorian literature that has become clichéd in our contemporary culture–lines from Tennyson like “In Spring a young man’s fancy lightly turns to thoughts of love” come to mind in this balmy weather.  (I will never forget reading “Locksley Hall” for the first time as an undergrad and realizing that the line came from somewhere!)  My friend and I also had a great time talking about clichés of Victorian narrative that have made their way into Downton Abbey, but alas, there was no formal analysis of this topic…

What are your favourite Victorian cliches?  Are there any you live your life by?

p.s. Next year’s conference, held at Boston University, will be on the theme of “1874”.  The year was picked out of a hat out of the 63 years of Victoria’s reign!  I love the specificity.  Does anything come to mind for you when you hear “1874”?


2 thoughts on “NVSA

  1. I completely agree with your take on the excellent NVSA program format, Karen. To have the entire group of attendees present at almost all of the sessions (the three meetings of NVSA I’ve attended each had a single pair of concurrent sessions on their respective Saturday afternoons) makes possible a rich, sprawling, communal conversation that grows a personality and character all its own by the end of the gathering.

    I also remember with delight the utter madness of NVSA’s traditional Saturday lunch selection of the next year’s conference theme. I can only imagine how much fun it must have been to see a date get pulled out of a hat. I predict a panel related to Hardy’s _Far From the Madding Crowd_ and something about Disraeli’s Conservatives coming to majority power.

    Thanks for the conference synopsis!

  2. oooh–great comment Fiona. I love _Far from the Madding Crowd_. The only thing I could come up with off the top of my head for 1874 were Craik’s diaries for that year, hardly original!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s